Saturday, 8 September 2012

Hands-on with the Amazon Kindle Fire HD


Amazon's push to sell consumers more content by selling them hardware they can use to buy and consume that content continued on Thursday. At a press event in the US, the company introduced not only updated Kindles and a beefier Kindle Fire but also three new Kindle Fire HD tablets.Image1
After the presentation, we got a chance to get our nerdy hands on the newest HD version of the Fire. We were impressed.
The is the Kindle Amazon hopes will take on the iPad in the tablet space. According to Amazon, the Kindle Fire currently owns 22 percent of the tablet market. Clearly Jeff Bezos wants more. The new seven-inch Kindle Fire HD feels more like a true iPad competitor. It sheds much of its predecessor's bulk and delivers a speedier more refined experience. The screen is crisp, with better contrast than the old Kindle Fire. However, while Amazon says that it has reduced the glare on the Fire HD's display, it's still a struggle under bright lights.
The external button has been moved from the bottom to the top on the Fire HD. It now sits flush with the case of the tablet, which should reduce instances of users accidentally putting the Fire into sleep mode while propping it up to read a book -- an all-too-common occurrence with the previous design. There are now physical volume buttons at the top of the device, too -- a welcome improvement over the software-based volume control.
Amazon's customised Android skin remains, but with tweaks that improve navigation. Sliding a finger from the top of the screen brings up settings, for example, which is much better than trying to tap that tiny gear. The new Coverflow-esque feature that replaces the bookshelf of the current Kindle Fire seems more like a lateral move than a step up, but the Favorites drawer is a welcome addition.
The speakers on the back are hidden within the distinctive black stripe that, even if not intentionally decorative, sets the Kindle Fire HD apart from other tablets. Unfortunately, the noisy airplane hangar where Amazon held its launch event was no good for testing audio performance, so we can't say anything about the sound.
All these tests were done on the seven-inch Kindle Fire HD.
The Kindle Fire HD is available for pre-order at £159 for the 16GB model and £199 for the 32GB version. 

Friday, 31 August 2012

Hottest Tech you need to own.








Having unveiled its first S tablet at IFA last year, Sony has given its latest slate the Xperia branded makeover, making it thinner (8mm) and lighter than its predecessor. Running on Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich and powered by a NVIDIA Tegra 3 quadcore processor, the Tablet S also hosts a 9.4-inch 1280x800 IPS OptiContrast display and Sony’s ClearAudio+ technology making it suitable surroundings for watching movies. There’s an 8-Megapixel rear-facing camera and 1.0-Megapixel front-facing snapper both which shoot in HD, while other notable specs include SD card support and a 10 hour play time courtesy of a 6,000 mAh capacity battery.
Price: TBC | Release date: September 2012,

Slimmed-Down Sony Xperia -Tablet S unveiled.

Slimmed-down Sony Xperia Tablet S unveiled


Sony has revealed its latest Android tablet.  " Sony Xperia Tablet S".
The new tablet comes with a slim aluminium body, a 'splash-proof design' (for the kitchen, see?) and the option of some specially-made docks and other accessories which you can buy separately.
It may look a little familiar, given that we've a) seen it in leaks galore over the past few weeks and b) seen it in chunkier form as its predecessor, the Sony Tablet S.
Running this puppy are the quad-core Nvidia Tegra 3 processor and Android 4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich) rather than the more up-to-date Jelly Bean. The chillier snack-set was rumoured in the latest Xperia Tablet leak.Sony hasn't said whether the device will get the Jelly Bean upgrade or not.

Name game.

Available in three storage options (16GB, 32GB and 64GB), the tablet comes with Bluetooth 3.0 and Wi-Fi connectivity, and there's an 8MP camera on the back with a 1MP HD web snapper on the front too.
Like its similarly-monickered predecessor, the Sony Tablet S, the Xperia Tablet S has a laser-like focus on media apps which should all be in line with the Xperia smartphones now too.
This means that the likes of Walkman, Music Unlimited and Sony's movies app will now work the same across all its smartphones and tablets.
Keeping all that media action going is a 6000mAh battery which Sony reckons will give you 10 hours of web browsing or 12 hours of video playback from a full charge.
As for an official release date or price for the Xperia Tablet S, we're still in the dark – we've had our sleuthing hat on and managed to hunt the slate down this summer so check out our many and varied thoughts on the new slate in our hands on. 
If you can't wait long enough even to click that link, we've got a video demo of the Sony Xperia Tablet S ready and raring to go

Wednesday, 29 August 2012

Social network Best of all Worlds targets the one percent

Erik and Louise Wachtmeister, founders of exclusive social network ASmallWorld, have launched another private, online community called Best of All Worlds.Image1
The invite-only social network -- which can be accessed via web, iPhone and iPad apps -- aims to provide the world's leading entrepreneurs, creative types, thinkers and influencers with a place to connect and plan their lives. Describing itself as a "social navigator", Best of All Worlds is designed to make sure that members don't find themselves "overwhelmed with irrelevant connections".
Erik Wachtmeister explains: "So much of social media is about focusing on other people's past. Best of all Worlds is about paying more attention to our own future."
When Wired.co.uk meets Wachtmeister, he is keen to point out that it's not just for the super-rich. Rather, it aims to bridge the social and professional worlds of influential people. However, a quick glance at the events that have been selected as crucial suggest otherwise -- it's packed with fashion weeks, polo matches and design fairs.
The platform lets users state their current and planned locations with the view to arrange to meet up with other members in those places. In order to find the right people to connect with, users can interact in a series of "worlds" that focus on a range of social and professional interests, such as business, food and wine, health, technology and art. Each world is curated and moderated by Best of All Worlds staff members.
Users can also set their "mode" to reflect their immediate interests, choosing between the likes of "professional", "social", "family" or "party" modes depending on their intent. Similarly users can easily flip between privacy modes, choosing visibility to the entire membership, just their network, friends of friends or being "invisible".
The plan is to work on building a strong network before starting to generate revenue from referrals and posh Yellow Pages-style listings for different events and venues.
Husband-and-wife team Erik and Louise Wachmeister launched ASmallWorld in 2004. The platform grew its user base quickly to reach 700,000. In 2006, movie giant Harvey Weinstein took a controlling stake in the company in what was his first internet investment. The Wachtmeisters left the company in 2008 after differing visions about the company's future direction. In March 2011,Weinstein described his investment as "one of my all-time doozies". In his own words, he "ignored technology and went after the bottom line" instead of concentrating on making the platform better like other social networking sites did. As a result, the "other social sites kicked my butt" and he sold the company for a loss.
Best of All Worlds has seed investment from members of the Saudi Royal Family. The team is based in Stockholm and Silicon Valley. A group of 25,000 people have been trialing the app in a closed beta. Users can invite up to 10 others to join the platform and it's coming out of beta over the next few days.
The challenge will be finding a balance between exclusivity and the network effect that makes platforms such as Facebook and LinkedIn so powerful.
Are you intrigued by this sort of high-end social network? Tell us in the comments below.

Friday, 10 August 2012

Windows 7 all-in-ones go out big

We won't see Microsoft's old OS on too many new PCs, but this final batch of Windows 7 all-in-ones finally matches the giant display size in Apple's 27-inch iMac.

One highlight of this year's Consumer Electronics Show was the debut of the 27-inch Windows all-in-one. Finally, two-and-a-half years after Apple debuted the 27-inch iMac, Windows vendors found a way to compete.

Asus, HP, Lenovo, Samsung, and Vizio all had big-screen all-in-ones to show off, giving CES an uncommonly intriguing batch of desktop PC announcements.

I had some hands-on time with Vizio's 27-incher a few weeks ago, but the company still has not submitted a system for review. That Samsung Series 9 all-in-one has come out in   We also had a surprise 27-inch entry from Dell. Here's a roundup of our reviews. It might not be the best time to buy a new PC with Windows 8 refreshes likely right around the corner, but you can at least say that this last salvo of Windows 7 all-in-ones closed the gap with the 27-inch iMac.


is Google search engine new antipiracy machine???

Sites that generate too many copyright take-down notices will be moved lower in Google's search rankings.

Google search will be less welcoming to sites accused of piracy by copyright owners.

On the company's blog, Google outlined a new measure designed at penalizing sites that generate too many complaints from copyright owners.

"We will begin taking into account a new signal in our rankings: the number of valid copyright removal notices we receive for any given site," Google said in the blog post. " Sites with high numbers of removal notices may appear lower in our results."

This appears to be among the most significant antipiracy measure Google has ever adopted. The company's powerful search engine is how most people on the planet conduct Internet searches. For the past two years, Google has made more and more concessions to copyright owners, who have long demanded that Google take steps to prevent its search engine from aiding copyright infringement.

One of their biggest requests was for accused pirate sites to be blocked from showing up in search results. Copyright owners didn't get that but they got something approaching that. What can't be forgotten is that there are all kinds of sites that index and help steer people to sites that share unauthorized film and music files.

In the blog post, Google suggested that the intent of the change is not for the company to become a copyright cop but to help weed out illegitimate sources of music, movies and other digital media.

"This ranking change should help users find legitimate, quality sources of content more easily--whether it's a song previewed on NPR's music website, a TV show on Hulu or new music streamed from Spotify.

"Since we re-booted our copyright removals over two years ago, we've been given much more data by copyright owners about infringing content online," Google continued. "In fact, we're now receiving and processing more copyright removal notices every day than we did in all of 2009--more than 4.3 million URLs in the last 30 days alone. We will now be using this data as a signal in our search rankings."

Copyright owners were quick to applaud Google's plan.

"Today Google has announced a potentially significant change in its search rankings that can make a meaningful difference to creators," said Cary Sherman, CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America, the trade group for the four top music labels. "This change is an important step in the right direction -- a step we've been urging Google to take for a long time -- and we commend the company for its action."

I've written this many times but I'll write it again. For you free-info hardliners, the thing to keep in mind is that Google is in the content distribution business.

Hollywood sources have told me for years that Google would struggle to get all the content it needed as long as the parent company dragged its feet on antipiracy. If Google Play and YouTube are to become serious competitors in music and movies, they need content and that means Google has to negotiate.

Antipiracy is apparently on the table.

Sunday, 22 July 2012

Do u think Epic Games was going to let Gears of War die after its third installment??


You didn't think Epic Games was going to let Gears of War die after its third installment, did you?
A fourth game in the Gears of War series was announced today at E3, entitled Gears of War Judgment.
gears4judgment3gears4judgment1gears4judgment2gears4judgment19The game is a prequel and focuses on events several years earlier than those in the first Gears of War game, smack bang in the aftermath of Emergence Day -- the infamous moment in the Gears world, in which hell broke loose and chainsaws started being plunged into the chests of the invading Locust enemy.]Plot-wise, Judgment centres on Augustus Cole, Damon Baird and a couple of fresh faces: Sofia Hendericks and Garron Paduk. Together they are Kilo Squad, attempting to save the city of Halvo Bay from "a terrifying new enemy", which presumably packs up its bags at the end of the game since we don't see hide nor hair of it in the last three Gears installments.
There will be new cooperative gameplay functions and multiplayer modes, plus a feature called Mission Declassification, which rewards the player with new story scenarios for discovering "critical information" during playthrough of the game's main campaign.
Little else is known about Gears of War Judgment, but an early 2013 release is promised worldwide


gears4judgment2gears4judgment7gears4judgment6gears4judgment11gears4judgment5gears4judgment1gears4judgment19gears4judgment3

Google's Marissa Mayer will try to save Yahoo as CE)


Longtime Google executive Marissa Mayer will become CEO of Yahoo, thrusting the prominent 37-year-old executive into a public highwire act as she tries to turn around the languishing company.
"There is a lot to do and I can't wait to get started," Mayer said in the official announcement.
Mayer's eagerness aside, the move is a gamble for her. Employee number 20 at Google, Mayer became a key executive at the company, overseeing search products and user interface for five years and eventually taking over local and location services. In 2010, she ascended to Google's elite operating committee.
Mayer's personal wealth from pre-IPO Google stock has allowed her to buy a penthouse in San Francisco's Four Seasons along with a home in well-to-do Palo Alto and a posh Vogue wedding. There's little doubt she could remain at Google, or quit conventional work entirely, and live in considerable comfort. She doesn't need to try and revive Yahoo.
"Marissa has been a tireless champion of our users," Google CEO Larry Page writes. "We  will miss her talents at Google."
By the end of 2011 Mayer's influence seemed to be waning. She was among several executives pushed out of the operating committee, Reuters reported, and wasn't visible at Google I/O this past June despite having keynoted in prior years.
Still, it's likely Mayer could have continued to make significant contributions at Google if she'd chosen to hang in. Her oversight of local put Mayer in charge of a crucial crossroads for Google.
At Yahoo, Mayer is rolling the dice on a much more daunting challenge. The company's C-suite has been a revolving door and Yahoo has bled top talent.
"Marissa has the energy and drive Yahoo needs," says YCombinator's Paul Buchheit, who worked closely with Mayer during the creation of Google's Gmail. "I can't wait to see what she does with the company."
A former Yahoo executive who left the company in recent years says Mayer will have to move quickly to repair Yahoo's reputation and bolster its flagging momentum. "Her joining Yahoo! is like a bomb," this person says. "The 'shock and awe' will briefly destabilise the legacy elements and parties that have been holding the company back. She needs to use her first 100 days aggressively to confront entrenched interests."
Mayer's ascent is a sign that Yahoo will compete aggressively on technology development rather than retreating into becoming an online media company that merely sells advertising, says Morningstar analyst Rick Summer. That means going up against formidable competitors like MicrosoftFacebook -- and Mayer's former employer.
"Yahoo has had declining use in its communications services and not much mobile success," says Summer. "It is the polar opposite from Google... She'll need to lead a team that creates a few strong technology products that will engage users and stem the loss in Yahoo's search business."
Mayer certainly has the chops to lead tech product development. She helped oversee the development of GmailGoogle News and Google Images. She has a master's degree in computer science from Stanford and is famous for her data-driven approach to product decisions.
But in other ways the job will be an odd fit. For one, Mayer has no real professional experience outside of her six different jobs at Google, a sort of parallel corporate universe where the gusher of profits from contextual advertising has subsidised virtually all of the company's operations for more than a decade.
Also, Yahoo has for the past decade operated not like Google, which is obsessed with software development, but as a sort of media company. Since Terry Semel took the reins in 2001, Yahoo's leadership has focused on advertising and marketing initiatives over technical advancement (with the possible exception of Jerry Yang's brief stint as CEO). In 2009, Yahoo ceded its once-core search engine to Microsoft, whose servers began powering Yahoo searches.
Restarting Yahoo tech development might have great long-term potential, but in the meantime it's relatively low-tech display ads that keep the lights on at Yahoo. Mayer will need help to keep that lifeline strong.
If she does pull off an unlikely turnaround, of course, Mayer's reputation in Silicon Valley will be sterling. She'll join turnaround gods like Steve Jobs at Apple and Louis Gerstner at IBM in the top tier of tech's pantheon.
Former Yahoo employees say Mayer needs to get climbing now if she'll ever reach those heights.
"It's not like she needs the money," one wrote in a closed Facebook group for Yahoo alumni. "She has to honestly feel like she can turn this ship around after it's already hit the iceberg, which is a pretty monumental challenge."

iTunes in the Cloud brings movie redownloading to the UK


iTunes in the Cloud for movies has today launched in the UK and 36 other markets globally.
Apple launched iTunes in the Cloud earlier this year. The free service allows users to redownload content previously bought from iTunes. Although the US launch included movies as part of this offer, UK customers were limited to music, apps and TV shows.
As of today, movies finally now form part of that offer. If you have bought films from Apple in the past and deleted them either by mistake or to save disk space, you can down redownload them for no extra cost. This is a particular advantage to Apple TV users, as it means the tiny set-top box becomes a conduit for streaming all past movie purchases.
www.techbuz.net  understands that almost all movies are available for use with iTunes in the Cloud, with the remaining few due to go live shortly.
In Europe, the service is now available in the UK, Ireland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Other countries now supported include Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Cambodia and Sri Lanka.

Get the cheapest UK iPad: A buyer's guide


So you've decided you need an iPad, but your bank balance isn't having any of it, so you desperately need to find the cheapest way to get one.
Don't worry. Wired.co.uk is here to look after you.
We have scoured the pages of Apple's website, the tariffs of the five UK networks that are offering iPad data-only tariffs, and fed it all into a big number-crunching machine. The result: we know the rock-bottom, most affordable ways to get a cheap iPad legitimately into your hands.
We've had to make a few assumptions -- the biggest being that you don't need more than 16GB of storage on the device itself, and that you're going to use it for 24 months before it becomes useless to you. Tweak the figures a little if you don't think that's true, though be aware that some of the contracts have 24-month minimum terms.
It's also worth saying a little more about the 3G packages on offer from the different networks. O2, Vodafone 3, T-Mobile and Orange all offer data bundles and a microSIM, but they're not created equal -- each has different little tweaks that make them better or worse than the others.
On the surface, Orange looks good because it comes with "unlimited" access to more than 150,000 Wi-Fi networks across Britain. But a fair usage policy limits access to those hotspots to 10GB per month -- this is Wi-Fi, for crying out loud. Why are there limits at all?
Before we give you the prices we need to know a little more about you. How much are you going to use your iPad, and where? If you're primarily thinking of buying the device for use in the home, and can't see any situations where you might want to take it somewhere else that doesn't have free Wi-Fi, then there's no point buying the model equipped with 3G access. If you do want 3G, then how much are you going to use it? Every single day, or maybe once a week?
Pick whichever category over the page applies to you best, and we'll point out your cheapest option -- you can bookmark that page to get back to just the prices quickly.
The housebound user
For users who just want the cheapest of the cheapest options. No 3G at all.
Limits: There isn't any 3G.
Data plan: None
Total cost over 24 months: £399
Effective monthly cost: £16.63
The light user
Very occasionally you'll take the iPad out of your house -- no more than once a fortnight.
Limits: We've costed the below such that you only use 3G once a fortnight, and you don't use more than 250MB each time. More use will cost you more.
Data plan: T-Mobile's PAYG Micro-Sim
Total cost over 24 months: £595
Effective monthly cost: £24.79

The connected user

A reasonable amount of usage, in case you want to get on the web from the train ride home.
Limits: 1GB per month, but you can use that whenever you want -- you can use a little bit every day if you like, rather than having to pay for a new chunk of data every time you use it. It's also a 1-month rolling contract, meaning you don't have to commit to a full two years of payment.
Data plan: Three's 1GB Pay Monthly Micro-sim
Total cost over 24 months: £679
Effective monthly cost: £28.29

The road warrior

For the all-consuming, data-hungry user who's almost never in range of Wi-Fi.
Limits: If what you want is bang-for-buck when it comes to data, you can't get better than Three's 24-month, £25-per-month that comes with a whopping 15GB of data. That's a price-per-month-per-gigabyte of £2.30, including the cost of the iPad itself -- far below its competitors. Of course, you need to ask yourself whether you're going to use all that data.
Data plan: Three's 15GB 24-month iPad 2
Total cost over 24 months: £829
Effective monthly cost
: £34.54
So there you have it. The full range of possibilities. If you want to see our datasheet, which covers all offerings from all providers (that we found) then you can see it here, ordered by monthly cost. If it's an iPad you've got to have, then this is the cheapest you're going to get it.

Monday, 9 July 2012

Google Nexus Q review


The Google Nexus Q is a device most of us can ignore for the time being.
It does generate a lot of curiosity, which is deserved, as it’s a gorgeous product that demonstrates Google is getting more serious about two things: selling digital content, and making Android devices without touchscreens.
The Q is
an austere, matte black sphere that streams music and videos from the cloud. The entire top hemisphere is an endlessly rotating volume knob that’s also touch-sensitive. (Tap it to mute the audio.) Around the equator is a ring of bright, colorful LEDs that dance to the music. The lower hemisphere is a die-cast zinc base with a number of ports — micro HDMI, micro USB, optical audio, Ethernet, and analog speaker connections — machined into the back. Inside are the guts of an Android smartphone and a 25-watt amp for powering a pair of speakers. It represents a huge milestone for Google, as it’s the company’s first consumer product developed and manufactured entirely in-house.
It’s a visual and tactile joy, and a marvel of engineering. ….But beauty is only skin-deep, and the Nexus Q’s functionality is so severely limited out of the box, it’s difficult for all but the most hardcore audio gadget fanatics to justify the price tag (currently $300 (£190) in the US, with a UK release as yet unconfirmed).
But the eyebrow raising doesn’t stop there. It’s only capable of streaming content from Google Play and YouTube. Confoundingly, you can’t use it to play any of the MP3s on your local network, nor can you stream music from Spotify or other services. It requires an Android phone or tablet running a special app to control it. There’s no support for iOS or Windows Phone. It forgoes regular analog speaker posts in favor of banana plug sockets.
So, it’s an enticing device — if you’re fully committed to buying and renting stuff from Google’s music and movie store, if you’ve bothered to upload all of your music to Google‘s cloud service, if you have an Android phone or tablet, and if you have a pair of speakers sitting around that happen to be able to accept banana plugs. That’s a lot of ifs.
The price tag seems shocking, but when you think about it, that’s actually not too bad. I see a lot of audiophile devices, and for something that feels, looks and sounds this nice, is made in the United States, and has a high-quality 25-watt amp and a fully capable Android circuit board inside — complete with a dual-core OMAP 4460 chip, 16GB of storage and 1GB of RAM — that price is reasonable.
Performance
First off, the Q sounds great. I have about 500 tracks stored in Google‘s music cloud (currently US-only, but an international launch is expected), so I listened to dozens of songs across multiple genres. The Q’s amp is efficient and clean, and gets plenty loud without growing distorted. I hooked the Q up to a pair of vintage Advent speakers. These have regular speaker posts instead of banana jacks, so I had to buy a set of adapters and fashion my own connections.
Queueing up tracks using the Google Play Music app is an easy enough experience, and I like the design of the player. If you have two (or more) friends on the same Wi-Fi network, you can all take turns throwing your music onto the Q. Whatever songs each individual has access to in Google’s cloud, just select them and add them to the queue. You can also select entire albums at once.Anyone can reorder the list to make their songs play sooner, and anyone can play songs from their own individual cloud-based libraries, sort of like you can do in iTunes DJ.
After your friends leave your house, you can keep listening to whatever songs they loaded onto your Q for a full day after they walk out the door. All the sharing is, of course, reliant on everyone having Android phones or tablets with the Nexus Q app installed. (If their phones have NFC chips, they can tap the Q to initiate the app download.) Regardless, the sharing features are very cool, and they turns the sleek orb into a social listening device (though this orb is probably more fun at parties).
I hooked the Q up to a television (using the included HDMI cable) and my surround-sound system, and things got less rosy. Setup was easy at the Wired office, but took around 20 minutes when I hooked it up at home and required a factory reset. The three HD movies I rented played fine and looked great, with totally accurate colors and no perceptible artifacts. Shopping in Google’s online store within the Movies & TV app is a messy experience, though. The app’s inscrutable navigation makes casual browsing a head-spinner, and title categories are muddled — J. Edgar is a documentary?
Once you find a movie, the controls for pausing and rewinding during playback are frustratingly poor. YouTube videos are served through the YouTube app, which is better. But the streams don’t look as good, and I experienced multiple hiccups during playback on both of the Wi-Fi networks I used for testing. One other frustration: You’d expect the video to pause when you get up and tap the Q, but instead, a tap just mutes it.
I’m guessing the majority of the people buying a Q are going to plug it straight into their televisions and surround-sound receivers. So it’s a shame the video experience is weaker than the audio experience, and that the sweet-sounding amp goes unused unless you hook up a pair of speakers.
The Q doesn’t compete with Roku or Apple TV — it only plays music and videos stored within your Google Play account, and you can’t throw video or audio from any apps other than YouTube. So no iTunes content, no Netflix, no Spotify. It doesn’t really square with AirPlay or DLNA devices either, as those also allow far more streaming options than just Google Play and YouTube. A Sonos Connect Amp? Maybe, but the Q also plays video and allows your friends to stream their Google Play music while they’re on your Wi-Fi network, neither of which Sonos does. But if you hook up multiple Qs on one network, they can all only play the same track — unlike Sonos, which lets you send different tracks to different speakers.
So, what does the Nexus Q compete with? Nothing, really. At least nothing that’s available on the shelves right now. It’s an entirely unique product made for a very narrow audience, and its limitations will likely prevent it from succeeding as a consumer device.
There’s no way people are going to run out and snatch these up at the same rate they’re buying Apple TVs and Sonos speakers. Audiophiles probably won’t bother, either — there are other 25-watt Class D amps out there that don’t limit you to 320k MP3 streams, which is as high-fidelity as Google Play gets.
So, who will buy this thing? Android nerds. Developers truly excited about hardware design, platform extensibility and embedded software. The types of people who will immediately hook it to their PC instead of their TV, and fire up adb instead of The Muppets. Google has made the device easily accessible, and it has the ports to accept hardware controllers and external displays. Hackers have already gotten it to load games, and we’ll surely continue to see video demos of marvelous experiments bubble up from the developer forums.
So what if we see it as a snooze? To them, it’s a dream.

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

mac notebook review(Apple)

  • Apple's Retina MacBook Pro has a stunning display but doesn't come cheap, writes Shane Richmond.


Apple used the WWDC keynote to announce more details of Mountain Lion - the next version of its Mac operating system, which is released next month - and iOS 6, the latest update to the operating system that powers the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. But the most groundbreaking announcement was the new MacBook Pro with a 'Retina' display.


What WWDC demonstrated was how, after several years of rapid expansion into new product areas, Apple’s products are now starting to come together again. Mountain Lion and iOS 6 share plenty of features, particularly the iCloud integration that allows content to flow freely from, say, smartphone to laptop.


Meanwhile, Apple’s MacBooks are starting to show the influence of iOS devices in numerous ways, whether it’s gesture controls on trackpads, high resolution displays or the fact that the computers are more likely to be sealed units, not upgradeable by users once they leave the shop.


Apple is not the first to do these things but it is doing them with an elegance and simplicity that many of its competitors struggle to imitate.


The screen on Apple's new flagship laptop, the MacBook Pro with Retina display, has to be seen to be believed. At 2880 x 1800 pixels, it can deliver double the screen resolution of the previous MacBook Pro and the difference is like putting on a pair of glasses for the first time.



Text looks as if it is printed onto the glass and pictures are extraordinarily sharp. There will be plenty who say that you don't need this kind of resolution but once you have tried it, you won't want to give it up.

Photographers and video editors will find the resolution especially useful. The screen can display a full 1080 video image and still have three million pixels to spare, meaning that tasks that used to require a much larger screen are now practical on a laptop of this size.

The screen has fewer reflections than previous models and offers a wide viewing angle. However, many apps will need to be updated to take full advantage of the new resolution and, as with the new iPad, browsing on this machine quickly reveals the low quality of images on most websites.

It is the screen that will grab the headlines but this is a powerful computer too. Its specifications match, and in some areas exceed, those of the standard 15-inch MacBook Pro and yet it is thinner and lighter than the 13-inch model. I've used an 11-inch MacBook Air as my main computer for a year now so this new machine feels like a cinema display sitting in my lap. But it took just a brief comparison with my old 15-inch MacBook Pro to make me realise just how much the machine has slimmed down.

Conversely, after a few hours using the new MacBook Pro, the 11-inch Air then feels impossibly small. Switching between the two machines, as I've been doing for the last couple of days, can be disorientating.

Apple has changed the way it builds its machines in order to make this new slimline Pro possible. The display is built-in to the unibody construction, reducing weight and thickness, while the cooling system uses asymmetrical fans to reduce noise.

Gone are some features that many users will still consider essential. Like the MacBook Air, this machine doesn't come with an optical drive. Those who really need to use DVDs and CDs will need an external drive. Anyone who needs an ethernet port or a Firewire port will have to get an adaptor. Even Apple's power lead has changed, so anyone who typically connects their laptop to an external display will also need an adaptor.

The hard drive is gone too - again, as in the MacBook Air. It is replaced by up to 768GB of flash memory. The 256GB default offering assumes that most people will store the bulk of their content on external drives or in the cloud. The benefit is speed; this computer is noticeably faster and more responsive than previous models.

Many who equate the 'pro' designation with flexibility and the freedom to customise your machine will baulk at Apple's decisions here. You cannot replace the battery on this machine yourself - something that has been the case with Macs for a few years - and you cannot upgrade the RAM after purchase either.

And none of this comes cheap. The standard model, with a 2.3GHz Intel Core i7 processor, starts at £1,799. The 2.6GHz version starts at £2,299. That said, a Sony VAIO with similar specs and a smaller, lower-resolution screen, will cost you around £2,000.

Those users who are willing to spend the money will get an exceptional machine, one that points to the future of laptops as much as the MacBook Air did before it. Just as the MacBook Air is now being emulated by PC manufacturers as the 'Ultrabook' so you can expect ultra-high resolution displays to be standard on top tier laptops before too long.

Microsoft Surface Tablet First Impressions: Awesome

LOS ANGELES -- Microsoft debuted a new tablet today, or rather a tablet family based on its upcoming Windows 8 OS. We get a behind-the-scenes tour at some of the tech that went into making the device, which arrives later this year.



Earlier today, Microsoft held a mysterious event in Los Angeles. We talked about a Microsoft tablet, but to be honest, we were expecting a Windows RT (for ARM) demo with different vendors rather than a full-blown Microsoft launch with their own tablets 

The essence of the two Windows Surface tablets is that “it’s the Windows you know” -in a tablet- but in a fashion that does not get in the way of productivity. The cover/keyboard which comes in two variants illustrates this extremely well: one keyboard is super-thin and another keyboard has deeper key travel space and is one of the best keyboard setup in terms of compactness/effectiveness ratio. Both have an awesome design, and once the cover is on, they feel like a book cover, really. 


It’s funny because this the type of keyboard integration that we always wanted with the iPad, but never got. Also, this is not a wireless keyboard, so not only it does not require a battery, and it is connected to the tablet with a low latency link (1/1000s). This is hands-down the best productivity apparatus that we have seen on a tablet thus far. For sure, the keyboard is going to be a best-selling accessory. Microsoft would not confirm if the keyboard was bundled with the system or not, but given that there are multiple color options, a bundle seems unlikely.

The keyboard also serve as a display cover and this should make most people happy. Despite the fact that modern displays are often resistant to scratches, even from a combat knife steel tip, people do feel better about having some kind of protection for their tablet screen.

Last, but not least, Microsoft has managed to add a full-size USB 2.0 port to make this easy to connect and transfer data from USB keys, cameras and other things that you have grown accustomed to with your PC. Microsoft integrated a full-size USB port in a 9.3mm-thick body, something that was deemed “impossible” not so long ago by major tablet makers.
  In terms of functionality, the Microsoft Surface tablet line-up comes in two versions: one of them is equipped with a Tegra 3 ARM-based processor that runs Windows 8 RT (ARM version). This particular tablet can only run the Windows 8 Metro applications, but it is very thin and light, just like you would expect from a modern tablet. In theory, the Surface for Windows RT will come with MS Office and the Mail application.

The Surface Pro tablet is powered by an Intel Core i5 CPU and runs the desktop version of Windows 8, which means that it can run any Windows or DOS application that were ever created (games too). In addition to being a tablet, the Surface Pro can connect to a large display, keyboard and mouse and turn into a full-blown Windows computer

When we played with the Tegra 3 based tablet running on Windows RT, it felt like a very high-quality device. Instead of aluminum, Microsoft has used VaporMag, a magnesium variant that allowed the tablet to be very rigid and solid. We could feel how rigid it was when trying to apply twist and sheer force on it. It is also scratch-resistant, more so than bare aluminum in our opinion (aluminum bodies often scratch with a strong nail pressure).

Specifications Highlight

Surface Windows RT
676g
9.3mm thick
10.6” display (resolution unconfirmed, looks like 1366×768)
Tegra 3 chip
31.5Wh battery
microSD slot, full-size USB 2.0 port, micro HD video out
Dual WiFi antenna (higher throughput)
Integrated stand
32GB or 64GB of internal storage

Surface Windows 8 Pro
903g
13.3mm thick
10.6” display (resolution unconfirmed, looks like 1366×768)
42Wh battery
microSDXC slot, full-size USB 3.0 port, mini DisplayPort video out
Dual WiFi antenna (higher throughput)
Integrated stand
64GB or 128GB of internal storage

A brief history of failed Window pc tablet

The Microsoft Surface tablet will find the bar set fairly low by previous Windows slate


Seeing all the attention (and unexpectedly lavish praise) heaped on Microsoft's just-announced Surface tablet reminds me of all the great Windows tablets I've tested and reviewed over the years.

Wait, that's not right. The vast majority of Windows-powered tablets I've tried have been terrible. Some hit minimum levels of functionality, but nearly all were underpowered, lacked touch-centered software, were too expensive, or had terrible input hardware

It's interesting to note that many of these examples date from the pre-iPad era. Once Apple's tablet hit the scene, there was a sharp drop-off in Windows tablets. Did PC makers decide they needed time to regroup and rethink after seeing what Apple could deliver for $499? 
One of the only high-profile Windows tablets announced post-iPad was the HP Windows 7 Slate. After a teaser campaign of YouTube videos and promotional photos, the actual product was essentially cancelled, but revived as the underwhelming HP Slate 500, a business-only tablet that didn't do much for us, and the WebOS HP TouchPad, one of the most infamous tech flameouts in recent history.


,microsoft surface tablet
Microsoft may fare better with the new Surface (perhaps it really is easier when you make both the software and the hardware), or it could just as easily go down as yet another Windows tablet that didn't live up to the hype.

In this gallery of Windows tablets, you'll see many of the touch-screen PCs we've tested, reviewed, or reported on over the past several years. Why is this important? Because those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.

Sunday, 17 June 2012

Interactive 'wallpaper' screens are the future of TV







T




he way we watch TV in the future is likely to change significantly from today. Tileable, interactive TV "wallpaper" will dominate the room, with wrap-around screens that recruit your peripheral vision to create a truly immersive experience. What's more, you'll be able to use part or all of the screen for different shows, movies, web pages or Twitter timelines.







Wall-sized, total-immersion TVs will change how you watch your favourite shows







THINK your flat-screen television is big? You ain't seen nothing yet.










But how will you organise and control all this on your giant, immersive screen?







This is the kind of question that News Digital Systems (NDS), a maker of pay-TV transmission technology, says broadcasters ought to be asking over the next decade as wall-covering TVs become a practical reality that goes beyond dim, low-resolution projectors or giant, power-hungry single flat screens. "It's amazing how science fiction has accurately predicted where our future television technology is going," says Simon Parnall, vice-president of technology at NDS in Staines, UK.







The firm's latest idea is called Surfaces and is predicated on the fact that the next generation of flat-screen TVs, based on organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays, will drop in price considerably in the next five to 10 years. OLED display panels have a great advantage: unlike LCD screens, they need no side lighting - so the picture display area can go right up to the screen edge. That means they can be placed next to each other to create a continuous display.







"We will be able to make this OLED flat-panel technology tileable. And these can be any shape you like, not just rectangular arrays," Parnall told London'sFuture World Symposium in April.







The first 1.4-metre OLED TVs, made by LG Electronics and Samsung of South Korea, will arrive on the market later this year. They are likely to cost around £8000 at first, says John Kempner, buyer for TV and video at the John Lewis Partnership, a UK department-store chain. But he also thinks the trend is for "fairly rapid price deflation" and expects the cost to fall below £3000 within two years. Models costing £1000 or less should be available in five to 10 years.







Using six OLED panels, NDS has constructed a 3.6-metre-by-1.4-metre prototype screen that, when not in use, simply displays the pattern on the wall behind it. "It's ambient," says Parnall. A video server pushes high-definition content to the screen under the control of an ordinary browser on the user's smartphone or computer, which also lets people choose where on the screen they want their video, web, social media or Skype. Some of today's TVs can already be controlled with an app in addition to a remote, says Kempner.







The prototype has been screening the X Factor talent show in the centre of the screen, with web content on each contestant to the right, a voting widget beneath it, and Twitter timelines of audience reactions to the left.







Central to the experience is how much immersion viewers want. A family watching a movie might choose deep immersion and make the film cover most of the screen - with perhaps a social media comment stream below it.







For shallow immersion, news might be displayed in the middle, with any Skype calls or social media and web content dotted around the periphery. Separate audio channels could be beamed wirelessly to each user's phone or headset.







It's not just NDS that is working to change how we watch TV. Daniel Novy and Michael Bove at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are developing an immersive system called Infinity-by-Nine - a reference to the standard 16:9 wide-screen aspect ratio.







"We take advantage of some perceptual tricks," says Bove. "Peripheral vision isn't sensitive to detail but it is to motion, and the brain really wants to make a consistent explanation of what your peripheral vision sees and what your central, or foveal, vision sees." They use machine vision software to analyse, say, a movie and then generate, in real time, a moving low-resolution pattern that resembles the image on the screen. This gets projected onto the surrounding walls and ceiling. "The viewer isn't supposed to look directly at the added imagery, but its presence hugely increases the perceived sense of immersion into what's on the screen," says Bove.







It works because while colour and detail perception is diminished in our peripheral vision, motion sensitivity in those visual margins remains strong. So Infinity-by-Nine simply has to move the low-resolution pattern at the same speed as the main image to enhance the viewers' feeling of wrap-around immersion.







"While the effect might be strongest from a more central viewing position, it is still quite powerful from other seating positions. We have several couches in the room where this system runs, and when we leave a film playing we often come back to find people sitting on all of them, and on the floor," says Bove.







Still, too much information can be distracting, even off-putting, for some viewers. That is why Valentin Heun, also at MIT, is experimenting with a system called FocalSpace (pictured below), which uses Microsoft Kinect depth cameras to sense where the viewer is looking and dynamically enhance the contrast and colour of the imagery there, making those parts of the screen clearer and easier to concentrate on.







Kinect and systems like it could also control the NDS Surfaces, perhaps giving a greater level of control than an app. Samsung already allows gesture and voice control on its recently launched ES8000 smart TVs. "Gestures are a more natural way to do this," says Chris Wild, chief technology officer at interactive software firm Altran Praxis of Bath, UK. "Hand movements and gaze offer much more scope and a wider grammar for fine control of large screens than smartphones."

Friday, 15 June 2012

Facebook Confirms Testing ‘Call’ Button for Online Video Chats


Facebook is reminding users how to make video calls via the social network by testing a “Call” button on member Timeline pages.The button, which was first spotted by TechCrunch, is located next to the “Message” option on Facebook Timeline’s layout. The “Chat” button would replace the subtle video-camera icon now used to start an online video chat.
A Facebook confirmed that the button is only a test, so it’s unknown at this time if it will become a permanent part of Timeline. In the meantime, some members using a desktop version of Facebook will be able to test the feature Although Facebook partnered with popular online chat service Skype nearly a year ago, the social network hasn’t made the option overly visible on the site… Now with the increase in popularity of social chat services such as Google Hangouts and Airtime — which was launched by former Facebook president Sean Parker — it looks like Facebook is ready to get the service more on its users’ radar.This isn’t the first time Facebook has played with the concept of a “Call” button. It was featured on the previous version of profile pages, but it was hard to find in the settings drop-down menu.
Do you think the “Call” button will influence Facebook members to use video chat more? Will Facebook be able to compete against other social video chat services such as Airtime and Google Hangouts? Let us know your opinion in the comments.